In a revelation that has sent shockwaves through the aviation industry, Daryl Guberman emerges as a central figure, ready to unveil a web of concerning allegations. As the esteemed CEO of Guberman PMC, LLC Quality Consulting Firm & Quality Register G-PMC, LLC, Guberman brings with him a wealth of experience that he has gained over more than forty years in various sectors, including aerospace, medical implants, printing, and plastic distribution. His expertise positions him uniquely at the intersection of industry insight and integrity, making him a formidable force in the quest for transparency and accountability.
Who Is Responsible For Manufacturing Quality: QA Expert Daryl Guberman Explains
With a deep understanding of the intricacies of these industries, Guberman sets out on a mission to shine a light on the shadows enveloping both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and aerospace giant Boeing. What began as a routine inquiry soon turned into a journey of discovery, uncovering layers of systemic challenges and potential lapses in safety protocols. Guberman’s revelations are not merely disclosures; they represent a resounding call to action—a call for accountability and a rallying cry for the preservation of safety and integrity within the skies above.
As Guberman peels back the layers of complexity, the magnitude of his findings becomes increasingly apparent. Each revelation serves as a testament to the urgent need for transparency and reform within the aviation industry. But what lies beneath the surface is yet to be fully revealed—a glimpse into a world where safety may have been compromised, and accountability may have faltered. In the following pages, we step on a journey of exploration, guided by Guberman’s commitment to uncovering the truth.
Prepare to delve into the heart of the matter as we uncover the secrets lurking within the aviation industry and confront the challenges that lie ahead.
A Closer Look at Regulatory Oversight: Mike Whitaker’s Complicity
As we step on a journey to explore the intricacies of regulatory oversight within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) during the tenure of Mike Whitaker as Deputy Administrator, we are confronted with a myriad of revelations brought to light by Daryl Guberman’s meticulous investigation. Guberman’s thorough examination unveils a lot of concerning findings that prompt us to scrutinize the effectiveness of the FAA’s mandate to ensure air travel safety during Whitaker’s leadership from 2013 to 2016.
Through the lens of Guberman’s detailed analysis, we begin to unravel a troubling pattern of regulatory complacency and potential involvement in safety violations within the FAA QA Expert Daryl Guberman ALERTS “CEO’s Major Airlines” About BOEING Being FAA Regulator 2009-Present. It becomes apparent that significant issues regarding safety oversight may have been left unaddressed, casting doubt on the agency’s ability to fulfill its duty to protect passengers and uphold the integrity of the aviation industry. These findings compel us to reflect on the fundamental principles of transparency and accountability within regulatory bodies, urging us to hold regulators to the highest standards to maintain public trust and ensure the safety of air travel for all passengers.
As we delve deeper into the inner workings of the FAA during Whitaker’s tenure, the gravity of the situation becomes increasingly evident. The failure to adequately address critical safety concerns underscores the urgent need for robust oversight and accountability mechanisms within regulatory agencies. Guberman’s investigation serves as a poignant reminder of the vital role that transparency and accountability play in safeguarding the integrity of the aviation industry and ensuring the safety of air travel.
In light of these revelations, it is imperative that we take a critical look at the regulatory framework governing air travel and enact meaningful reforms to address any shortcomings. By fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement within regulatory bodies, we can strive to restore public trust and confidence in the safety of air travel. Guberman’s investigation serves as a catalyst for change, urging us to confront the challenges at hand and work toward a future where safety is paramount and accountability is unwavering.
The Boeing Conundrum: Self-Certification and Quality Assurance Lapses
Expanding beyond the confines of the FAA How the FAA Ceded Aviation Safety Oversight to Boeing Daryl Guberman’s scrutiny extends to the aerospace behemoth Boeing. The controversy surrounding Boeing’s status as a self-certifying entity since 2009 to Present: FAA Grants Boeing More Autonomy On Certification has sent shockwaves throughout the aviation industry. This means that Boeing has the authority to say its own planes are safe without having someone else check. It’s a big deal because it raises serious questions about whether Boeing is being completely honest about the safety of its planes. This has led to concerns about the integrity of the certification process and the trustworthiness of safety assurances provided by Boeing Boeing’s Organizational Problems Date Back Two Decades.
Guberman’s investigation delves into the heart of Boeing’s operations, revealing a troubling pattern of alleged lapses in quality assurance, starting with their membership on ANSI-ANAB’s board ANSI-ANAB Annual Report 2018-2019: “Boeing” Pages 48-49 There are claims that Boeing might not always be doing a thorough job of making sure its planes meet the highest safety standards 2002 -Boeing Suppliers Notification Reference page 2: BQMS Survey Requirements The Notification basically states “If supplier is AS 9100-international quality standard for aerospace- certified through ANSI-ANAB, send in certificate to Boeing, and Boeing relinquishes on-site audits from 2002 to present for a piece of paper” Boeing sits on boards of both ANSI-ANAB that are required on their “Supplier Portal” or international equivalent here:
This includes accusations of falsifying documents and cutting corners when it comes to safety protocols. These revelations have cast a shadow over Boeing’s reputation as a global industry leader and have prompted urgent calls for increased scrutiny and accountability within the company.
Falsified Papers, Sloppy Work Led FAA to Fine Boeing (excerpt) https://www.defense-aerospace.com/falsified-papers-sloppy-work-led-faa-to-fine-boeing/
Boeing passenger jets have falsely-certified Kobe Steel products: source https://finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-passenger-jets-falsely-certified-kobe-steel-products-021244749–sector.html
Boeing to Pay $8.1 Million to Resolve Alleged False Claims Act Violations Arising from Manufacture of V-22 Osprey Aircraft https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/boeing-pay-81-million-resolve-alleged-false-claims-act-violations-arising-manufacture
The implications of these alleged quality assurance lapses are profound, as they directly impact the safety and well-being of millions of air travelers worldwide. The prospect of compromised safety protocols raises serious concerns about the reliability of Boeing aircraft and the potential risks posed to passengers. It’s a matter of utmost importance that Boeing addresses these allegations promptly and transparently to restore public trust and confidence in the safety of air travel.
The urgency of the situation cannot be overstated. Heightened scrutiny and accountability within Boeing’s ranks are imperative to ensure that the highest safety standards are upheld and that passengers can have full confidence in the airworthiness of Boeing aircraft. The stakes are high, and decisive action must be taken to address these concerns and uphold the integrity of the aviation industry as a whole.
Foreign Influence and Regulatory Capture: ANSI and ANAB Under the Microscope
Diving deeper into how regulations are made and enforced, Guberman focuses on two important organizations: the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is an over one-hundred year-old private, nonprofit corporation, which has both Federal Agencies like examples FBI,CDC,FAA,FDA,NIH & Corporations like examples Boeing, Lockheed, Pfizer, J&J and the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB)ANSI Acquires Full Ownership of ANAB (2018) ANSI-ANAB are also underwriters for the IAF(International Accreditation Forum)incorporated in Delaware. IAF is a repository for both national and international accreditation bodies. Those accreditation bodies that sit on the IAF are equivalent in accreditation to ANSI-ANAB. Also, ILAC the international laboratory accreditation cooperation.
Guberman uncovers some connections these organizations have with other countries, like Communist China, Iran, and Pakistan. They are members of the IAF and equivalent to ANSI-ANAB accreditation. Iran most recently got suspended for lack of payment to the IAF. Guberman’s careful investigation reveals some factors that these organizations might be influenced by foreign interests. This highlights the need for us to be more watchful and open about how regulations are made to make sure they’re fair and unbiased.
The idea that foreign countries might have a say in how regulations are made raises some big questions: With China’s OK, Lockheed Martin to close on Sikorsky purchase.
It makes us wonder if these organizations can really make decisions without being influenced by outside interests. This means we need to take a closer look at how these organizations work to make sure they’re not being swayed by foreign powers. It’s important to make sure these organizations are independent and make decisions based on what’s best for everyone, not just a few select interests.
The potential for foreign influence in regulatory processes is a serious concern that needs to be addressed urgently. We need to carefully examine how these organizations operate and make sure they’re acting in the best interests of the public. This might mean making some changes to how these organizations are run to ensure they’re transparent and accountable. Restoring public trust in the regulatory framework governing the aviation industry is essential for ensuring safety and fairness for all.
The Urgent Imperative for Action: Safeguarding Passenger Safety
As Daryl Guberman’s revelations echo throughout the aviation industry, the need for decisive action becomes increasingly urgent. It’s not just a matter of fixing small problems – passenger safety is at stake, and that’s a big deal. Everyone involved in aviation, from airline companies to government regulators, must come together to address the deep-rooted challenges that threaten to erode public trust and confidence in air travel. We can’t afford to sweep these issues under the rug or pretend they don’t exist. Instead, we need to shine a light on them, acknowledge them, and commit to making real changes to ensure the safety and security of every passenger.
Transparency is key. We need to be open and honest about the problems we’re facing, whether it’s lapses in safety protocols, regulatory failures, or other issues that compromise passenger safety. By acknowledging these challenges openly, we can begin to address them effectively.
Accountability is equally crucial. Those responsible for ensuring passenger safety – whether they’re airline executives, government officials, or regulatory agencies – must be held accountable for their actions. This means taking responsibility for mistakes, learning from them, and implementing meaningful reforms to prevent similar issues from occurring in the future.
Moreover, we must prioritize safety above all else. This means making significant changes to how we approach safety protocols, regulatory oversight, and industry practices to ensure that every aspect of air travel is geared toward protecting passengers. It’s not just about meeting minimum safety standards – it’s about going above and beyond to create an environment where passengers feel confident that their safety is being prioritized at every step of their journey.
Ultimately, safeguarding passenger safety requires a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach that addresses the root causes of safety concerns and implements proactive measures to prevent future issues. It’s a daunting task, but one that must be undertaken with unwavering commitment and dedication to ensuring that the skies remain a sanctuary of safety and security for all who travel. Most passengers and people in general say “more people get killed in car accidents every year than airplane accidents.” Guberman said though “This may be true concerning aerospace accidents but when a plane crashes it takes with it 100-300 plus passengers at one time” “The 80-20 rule exists 80% will die and possibly 20% may live”. Guberman said “being vigilant about quality and not relying on a piece of paper AS9100 certification, as a testament to a company’s quality and integrity mind set at Boeing must be changed. Their ANSI-ANAB Board membership and specification on 2002 supplier notification and supplier portal degrades their affiliations with IAQG-international aerospace quality group, SAE-Society of automotive engineers to name a few do nothing to foster integrity and quality in aerospace.
Conclusion: Navigating the Path Forward
After a meticulous examination spanning various facets of the aviation industry, Daryl Guberman’s findings reveal a complex fabric of systemic challenges and potential lapses in safety protocols. His exposé sheds light on regulatory complacency within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) during the tenure of Mike Whitaker, raising concerns about the agency’s ability to ensure air travel safety. Guberman’s scrutiny extends to aerospace giant Boeing, uncovering a troubling pattern of alleged quality assurance lapses and regulatory self-certification practices that cast doubt on the integrity of safety assurances Boeing’s manufacturing, ethical lapses go back decades Additionally, his investigation delves into the intricate web of connections between regulatory bodies such as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB) and foreign entities like Communist China, Iran, and Pakistan, highlighting potential vulnerabilities to external influence. These revelations underscore the urgent need for transparency, accountability, and proactive reforms to safeguard passenger safety and restore public trust in the aviation industry.
Daryl Guberman’s exposé serves as a wake-up call, sounding the alarm for regulators, industry players, and policymakers to take notice and take bold steps forward AOG Technics, Pfizer, J&J, Boeing Fudged Processes to Get Products Out-QA Expert Daryl Guberman Says. As the aviation industry grapples with a critical moment of accountability, it’s essential to stay true to the principles of truth and integrity as we move ahead. These principles must guide us like guiding stars, leading us through the storm of uncertainty toward a brighter future.
It’s clear that we can’t ignore the challenges that lie ahead. We need to tackle them head-on with determination and unity. That means everyone – from government agencies to airline companies to industry associations – must come together and work toward solutions. This collaborative effort is crucial in ensuring that the aviation industry emerges stronger and safer from this crisis.
Moreover, transparency and honesty must remain at the forefront of our efforts. We need to be open about the issues we face and transparent about the actions we take to address them. This openness builds trust and confidence among passengers and stakeholders alike, reassuring them that their safety is our top priority.
As we navigate the path forward, it’s essential to remember that this journey won’t be easy. There will be challenges and obstacles along the way. But with determination, resilience, and a steadfast commitment to accountability, we can overcome these challenges and build a future defined by safety, trust, and unwavering integrity.
In conclusion, Daryl Guberman’s exposé serves as a catalyst for change, urging us to confront the issues at hand and forge a path toward a brighter future for the aviation industry. By staying true to our principles and working together toward common goals, we can ensure that the skies remain safe and secure for all who travel. Boeing was once known for safety and engineering. But critics say an emphasis on profits changed that
Guberman has offered to be of service with his team at this critical juncture to assist Boeing in getting their quality back on track. If not, he has said overtures of a disaster worst than Malaysian & Ethiopian crashes may transpire.
For further information, please refer to the videos linked below:
FAA Chief Vows To Hold FAA Regulator Boeing 2009 To Present, Accountable For Safety Violations
CAN A REGULATOR OVERSEE A REGULATOR?? QA Expert Daryl Guberman Asks FAA & BOEING CEO David Calhoun
Boeing’s “MCAS System” Was Approved By Boeing Due To Them Being A FAA Regulator Since 2009
Lockheed F35’s Factory Flaws Persist Even After 800 Are Built:QA Expert Daryl Guberman Exposes Why.
Contact Information
For further information or media inquiries, please contact:
Name: Daryl Guberman
Company: Guberman-PMC, LLC
Address: 1345 Barnum Avenue, Suite 306, Stratford, CT 06614
Telephone: 203-556-1493
Email: daryltqrs@yahoo.com
YouTube Channel: Daryl Guberman’s YouTube Channel